developer + sales

Former-commit-id: 6b311ea01802ccdf3c3f4d537b83b9389aae6ca6

DOCS/DEVELOPER_PLAN.md

@@ -0,0 +1,60 @@
+# Flywheel Effect for Developer Acquisition and Incentivization
+
+As with the sales model, the developer acquisition and incentivization model also relies on a flywheel effect. This effect is particularly potent in a community-driven ecosystem such as ours, where the value proposition continually grows as more developers join and contribute to our projects. Here's how we could apply this approach:
+
+## Step 1: Initial Value Proposition for Developers
+The starting point of the flywheel is to provide an attractive value proposition for developers. This could include:
+
+- The ability to work on cutting-edge technology (Swarms, in this case).
+- The opportunity to contribute to a community-driven, open-source project.
+- The chance to learn from and collaborate with a global network of highly skilled developers.
+- An incentivization structure that rewards contributions (more on this later).
+
+## Step 2: Developer Acquisition
+With the initial value proposition in place, we can move on to the actual acquisition of developers. This could be accomplished through:
+
+- Active recruitment from online developer communities.
+- Referral programs that incentivize current contributors to bring in new developers.
+- Partnerships with universities, boot camps, and other institutions to attract budding developers.
+
+## Step 3: Collaboration and Learning
+Once developers join our ecosystem, they become part of a collaborative community where they can learn from each other, improve their skills, and work on exciting and meaningful projects. This, in turn, attracts more developers, adding momentum to the flywheel.
+
+## Step 4: Recognizing and Rewarding Contributions
+To keep the flywheel spinning, it's crucial to recognize and reward the contributions made by developers. This can be done in various ways:
+
+- Monetary rewards: Developers can be paid based on the value their contributions bring to the project. This could be determined through various metrics, such as the complexity of their contributions, the impact on the project, or the amount of their code that gets used in production.
+  
+- Reputation and recognition: The open-source nature of our project means that all contributions are public and can be used by developers to build their professional profiles. Contributors could also be highlighted on our website, in our communications, and at community events.
+
+- Career advancement: Developers who consistently make valuable contributions could be offered positions of leadership within the project, such as becoming maintainers or joining a steering committee.
+
+- Agora Tokens: We could create a system of tokens that are earned based on contributions. These tokens could be exchanged for various benefits, such as access to exclusive events, special training, or even physical goods.
+
+## Step 5: Scaling the Flywheel
+With the flywheel in motion, the next step is to scale. As our community grows and our technology improves, we can attract more developers and create more value. This leads to a virtuous cycle of growth, where each new developer adds to the attractiveness of our project, which in turn brings in more developers.
+
+In essence, this flywheel approach is about creating a community where everyone benefits from each other's contributions. The more value a developer adds, the more they are rewarded. The more developers contribute, the more value is created, attracting even more developers.
+
+Such a model not only aligns with our values of openness, collaboration, and shared success, but it also gives us a sustainable and scalable method for growing our developer community. It makes Agora not just a place to work, but also a place to learn, grow, and be recognized for one's contributions. This is a powerful way to ensure that we can continue to advance our technology and make a significant impact on the world.
+
+
+# Risks and mitigations
+
+The open source engineering freelancer model brings with it its own set of potential risks and challenges. Here's an exploration of some of these, along with strategies for mitigation:
+
+**1. Quality Control:** When dealing with a wide network of freelance contributors, ensuring a consistent standard of quality across all contributions can be challenging. This can be mitigated by implementing rigorous review processes and standards, establishing an automated testing infrastructure, and fostering a culture of quality among contributors. Providing clear contribution guidelines, code style guides, and other resources can help freelancers understand what's expected of them.
+
+**2. Security Risks:** Open-source projects can be susceptible to malicious contributors, who might introduce vulnerabilities into the codebase. To mitigate this, rigorous code review processes should be in place. Additionally, adopting a "trust but verify" approach, leveraging automated security scanning tools, and conducting periodic security audits can be beneficial.
+
+**3. Intellectual Property Issues:** Open-source projects can face risks around intellectual property, such as contributors introducing code that infringes on someone else's copyrights. A clear Contributor License Agreement (CLA) should be in place, which contributors need to agree to before their contributions can be accepted. This helps protect the project and its users from potential legal issues.
+
+**4. Loss of Core Focus:** With numerous contributors focusing on different aspects of the project, there can be a risk of losing sight of the project's core objectives. Maintaining a clear roadmap, having a strong leadership team, and ensuring open and regular communication can help keep the project focused.
+
+**5. Contributor Burnout:** Freelancers contributing in their free time might face burnout, especially if they feel their contributions aren't being recognized or rewarded. To mitigate this, create a supportive environment where contributors' efforts are acknowledged and rewarded. This might include monetary rewards, but can also include non-monetary rewards like public recognition, advancement opportunities within the project, and so on.
+
+**6. Fragmentation:** In open source projects, there is a risk of fragmentation where different contributors or groups of contributors might want to take the project in different directions. Strong project governance, a clear roadmap, and open, transparent decision-making processes can help mitigate this risk.
+
+**7. Dependency on Key Individuals:** If key parts of the project are understood and maintained by only a single contributor, there is a risk if that individual decides to leave or is unable to contribute for some reason. This can be mitigated by ensuring knowledge is shared and responsibilities are spread among multiple contributors.
+
+Overall, these risks can be managed with proper planning, clear communication, and the implementation of good governance and security practices. It's essential to approach the open source model with a clear understanding of these potential pitfalls and a plan to address them.