|
|
consider a graph paritioning algorithm
|
|
|
based on the quasi-meta-data extracted from python,git,documents,chats,
|
|
|
asts,traces,debug logs,audit logs and other traces.
|
|
|
|
|
|
consider the Model gpt-4o-2024-08-06
|
|
|
Input tokens: 128,000 context window!
|
|
|
Output tokens: 16,384 window
|
|
|
|
|
|
Now lets device a strategy to break our knowledge graph up into these window sizes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
here are the files, consider the names and how we can group them
|
|
|
|
|
|
find swarms/ -name \*.py -exec wc -c {} \; -print
|
|
|
|
|
|
Take these byte sizes and names and construct a model of the code in your mind as
|
|
|
a plantuml diagram as you go.
|
|
|
10599 swarms/structs/agent_registry.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/agent_registry.py
|
|
|
369 swarms/structs/omni_agent_types.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/omni_agent_types.py
|
|
|
8215 swarms/structs/auto_swarm.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/auto_swarm.py
|
|
|
5404 swarms/structs/workspace_manager.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/workspace_manager.py
|
|
|
15901 swarms/structs/base_structure.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/base_structure.py
|
|
|
13037 swarms/structs/agent_router.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/agent_router.py
|
|
|
16250 swarms/structs/groupchat.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/groupchat.py
|
|
|
484 swarms/structs/stopping_conditions.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/stopping_conditions.py
|
|
|
9933 swarms/structs/spreadsheet_swarm.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/spreadsheet_swarm.py
|
|
|
9069 swarms/structs/pulsar_swarm.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/pulsar_swarm.py
|
|
|
3935 swarms/structs/__init__.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/__init__.py
|
|
|
13502 swarms/structs/agent_memory_manager.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/agent_memory_manager.py
|
|
|
19483 swarms/structs/hiearchical_swarm.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/hiearchical_swarm.py
|
|
|
25654 swarms/structs/rearrange.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/rearrange.py
|
|
|
188 swarms/structs/output_types.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/output_types.py
|
|
|
7573 swarms/structs/round_robin.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/round_robin.py
|
|
|
5370 swarms/structs/company.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/company.py
|
|
|
8117 swarms/structs/mixture_of_agents.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/mixture_of_agents.py
|
|
|
7973 swarms/structs/multi_process_workflow.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/multi_process_workflow.py
|
|
|
22308 swarms/structs/concurrent_workflow.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/concurrent_workflow.py
|
|
|
13382 swarms/structs/swarming_architectures.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/swarming_architectures.py
|
|
|
93913 swarms/structs/agent.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/agent.py
|
|
|
2804 swarms/structs/agents_available.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/agents_available.py
|
|
|
7124 swarms/structs/safe_loading.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/safe_loading.py
|
|
|
13289 swarms/structs/base_workflow.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/base_workflow.py
|
|
|
11374 swarms/structs/swarm_load_balancer.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/swarm_load_balancer.py
|
|
|
6770 swarms/structs/queue_swarm.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/queue_swarm.py
|
|
|
14314 swarms/structs/conversation.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/conversation.py
|
|
|
11168 swarms/structs/swarm_builder.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/swarm_builder.py
|
|
|
3680 swarms/structs/utils.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/utils.py
|
|
|
7829 swarms/structs/groupchat_new.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/groupchat_new.py
|
|
|
25845 swarms/structs/swarm_router.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/swarm_router.py
|
|
|
20920 swarms/structs/graph_swarm.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/graph_swarm.py
|
|
|
8236 swarms/structs/sequential_workflow.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/sequential_workflow.py
|
|
|
11224 swarms/structs/auto_swarm_builder.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/auto_swarm_builder.py
|
|
|
12751 swarms/structs/task.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/task.py
|
|
|
732 swarms/structs/concat.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/concat.py
|
|
|
23537 swarms/structs/swarm_matcher.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/swarm_matcher.py
|
|
|
7730 swarms/structs/multi_agent_collab.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/multi_agent_collab.py
|
|
|
13790 swarms/structs/multi_agent_exec.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/multi_agent_exec.py
|
|
|
8629 swarms/structs/graph_workflow.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/graph_workflow.py
|
|
|
24453 swarms/structs/base_swarm.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/base_swarm.py
|
|
|
5578 swarms/structs/swarm_registry.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/swarm_registry.py
|
|
|
15301 swarms/structs/swarm_arange.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/swarm_arange.py
|
|
|
7009 swarms/structs/majority_voting.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/majority_voting.py
|
|
|
68 swarms/structs/swarm_id_generator.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/swarm_id_generator.py
|
|
|
12499 swarms/structs/tree_swarm.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/tree_swarm.py
|
|
|
26214 swarms/structs/async_workflow.py
|
|
|
swarms/structs/async_workflow.py
|
|
|
1854 swarms/telemetry/bootup.py
|
|
|
swarms/telemetry/bootup.py
|
|
|
1879 swarms/telemetry/user_utils.py
|
|
|
swarms/telemetry/user_utils.py
|
|
|
3801 swarms/telemetry/sys_info.py
|
|
|
swarms/telemetry/sys_info.py
|
|
|
791 swarms/telemetry/__init__.py
|
|
|
swarms/telemetry/__init__.py
|
|
|
1257 swarms/telemetry/sentry_active.py
|
|
|
swarms/telemetry/sentry_active.py
|
|
|
3325 swarms/telemetry/capture_sys_data.py
|
|
|
swarms/telemetry/capture_sys_data.py
|
|
|
1309 swarms/telemetry/auto_upgrade_swarms.py
|
|
|
swarms/telemetry/auto_upgrade_swarms.py
|
|
|
512 swarms/__init__.py
|
|
|
swarms/__init__.py
|
|
|
185 swarms/schemas/__init__.py
|
|
|
swarms/schemas/__init__.py
|
|
|
6345 swarms/schemas/agent_input_schema.py
|
|
|
swarms/schemas/agent_input_schema.py
|
|
|
2573 swarms/schemas/agent_step_schemas.py
|
|
|
swarms/schemas/agent_step_schemas.py
|
|
|
3267 swarms/schemas/base_schemas.py
|
|
|
swarms/schemas/base_schemas.py
|
|
|
4665 swarms/utils/add_docs_to_agents.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/add_docs_to_agents.py
|
|
|
7695 swarms/utils/lazy_loader.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/lazy_loader.py
|
|
|
3427 swarms/utils/data_to_text.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/data_to_text.py
|
|
|
3417 swarms/utils/litellm_wrapper.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/litellm_wrapper.py
|
|
|
685 swarms/utils/agent_ops_check.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/agent_ops_check.py
|
|
|
1106 swarms/utils/loguru_logger.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/loguru_logger.py
|
|
|
1067 swarms/utils/__init__.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/__init__.py
|
|
|
1660 swarms/utils/update_agent_system_prompts.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/update_agent_system_prompts.py
|
|
|
3917 swarms/utils/try_except_wrapper.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/try_except_wrapper.py
|
|
|
2562 swarms/utils/swarm_reliability_checks.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/swarm_reliability_checks.py
|
|
|
3156 swarms/utils/async_file_creation.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/async_file_creation.py
|
|
|
2376 swarms/utils/pandas_utils.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/pandas_utils.py
|
|
|
3242 swarms/utils/disable_logging.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/disable_logging.py
|
|
|
4495 swarms/utils/auto_download_check_packages.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/auto_download_check_packages.py
|
|
|
2936 swarms/utils/any_to_str.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/any_to_str.py
|
|
|
5007 swarms/utils/calculate_func_metrics.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/calculate_func_metrics.py
|
|
|
652 swarms/utils/markdown_message.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/markdown_message.py
|
|
|
4194 swarms/utils/formatter.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/formatter.py
|
|
|
1008 swarms/utils/class_args_wrapper.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/class_args_wrapper.py
|
|
|
1987 swarms/utils/parse_code.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/parse_code.py
|
|
|
3739 swarms/utils/wrapper_clusterop.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/wrapper_clusterop.py
|
|
|
4865 swarms/utils/file_processing.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/file_processing.py
|
|
|
1276 swarms/utils/pdf_to_text.py
|
|
|
swarms/utils/pdf_to_text.py
|
|
|
83 swarms/artifacts/__init__.py
|
|
|
swarms/artifacts/__init__.py
|
|
|
11076 swarms/artifacts/main_artifact.py
|
|
|
swarms/artifacts/main_artifact.py
|
|
|
5233 swarms/prompts/ai_research_team.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/ai_research_team.py
|
|
|
2960 swarms/prompts/react.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/react.py
|
|
|
5126 swarms/prompts/sales.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/sales.py
|
|
|
9156 swarms/prompts/aga.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/aga.py
|
|
|
2235 swarms/prompts/code_interpreter.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/code_interpreter.py
|
|
|
13215 swarms/prompts/python.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/python.py
|
|
|
2705 swarms/prompts/agent_prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/agent_prompt.py
|
|
|
747 swarms/prompts/__init__.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/__init__.py
|
|
|
11320 swarms/prompts/accountant_swarm_prompts.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/accountant_swarm_prompts.py
|
|
|
4280 swarms/prompts/swarm_manager_agent.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/swarm_manager_agent.py
|
|
|
7157 swarms/prompts/documentation.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/documentation.py
|
|
|
3511 swarms/prompts/multi_modal_prompts.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/multi_modal_prompts.py
|
|
|
4106 swarms/prompts/code_spawner.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/code_spawner.py
|
|
|
880 swarms/prompts/idea2img.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/idea2img.py
|
|
|
5604 swarms/prompts/autoswarm.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/autoswarm.py
|
|
|
3454 swarms/prompts/operations_agent_prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/operations_agent_prompt.py
|
|
|
3225 swarms/prompts/multi_modal_visual_prompts.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/multi_modal_visual_prompts.py
|
|
|
4271 swarms/prompts/tests.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/tests.py
|
|
|
3801 swarms/prompts/chat_prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/chat_prompt.py
|
|
|
4070 swarms/prompts/sop_generator_agent_prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/sop_generator_agent_prompt.py
|
|
|
6886 swarms/prompts/agent_prompts.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/agent_prompts.py
|
|
|
3346 swarms/prompts/legal_agent_prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/legal_agent_prompt.py
|
|
|
3984 swarms/prompts/support_agent_prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/support_agent_prompt.py
|
|
|
8333 swarms/prompts/product_agent_prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/product_agent_prompt.py
|
|
|
13981 swarms/prompts/autobloggen.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/autobloggen.py
|
|
|
6132 swarms/prompts/finance_agent_sys_prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/finance_agent_sys_prompt.py
|
|
|
9589 swarms/prompts/prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/prompt.py
|
|
|
3823 swarms/prompts/prompt_generator_optimizer.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/prompt_generator_optimizer.py
|
|
|
3374 swarms/prompts/meta_system_prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/meta_system_prompt.py
|
|
|
2349 swarms/prompts/xray_swarm_prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/xray_swarm_prompt.py
|
|
|
1566 swarms/prompts/debate.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/debate.py
|
|
|
1148 swarms/prompts/aot_prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/aot_prompt.py
|
|
|
728 swarms/prompts/task_assignment_prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/task_assignment_prompt.py
|
|
|
2658 swarms/prompts/ag_prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/ag_prompt.py
|
|
|
2679 swarms/prompts/security_team.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/security_team.py
|
|
|
10662 swarms/prompts/multi_modal_autonomous_instruction_prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/multi_modal_autonomous_instruction_prompt.py
|
|
|
1767 swarms/prompts/education.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/education.py
|
|
|
4117 swarms/prompts/growth_agent_prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/growth_agent_prompt.py
|
|
|
2149 swarms/prompts/personal_stylist.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/personal_stylist.py
|
|
|
3702 swarms/prompts/tools.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/tools.py
|
|
|
3675 swarms/prompts/visual_cot.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/visual_cot.py
|
|
|
2398 swarms/prompts/urban_planning.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/urban_planning.py
|
|
|
10144 swarms/prompts/programming.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/programming.py
|
|
|
3264 swarms/prompts/self_operating_prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/self_operating_prompt.py
|
|
|
4785 swarms/prompts/logistics.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/logistics.py
|
|
|
4412 swarms/prompts/prompt_generator.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/prompt_generator.py
|
|
|
0 swarms/prompts/refiner_agent_prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/refiner_agent_prompt.py
|
|
|
4640 swarms/prompts/summaries_prompts.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/summaries_prompts.py
|
|
|
5013 swarms/prompts/sales_prompts.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/sales_prompts.py
|
|
|
7113 swarms/prompts/agent_system_prompts.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/agent_system_prompts.py
|
|
|
2128 swarms/prompts/project_manager.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/project_manager.py
|
|
|
5554 swarms/prompts/worker_prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/worker_prompt.py
|
|
|
4180 swarms/prompts/finance_agent_prompt.py
|
|
|
swarms/prompts/finance_agent_prompt.py
|
|
|
628 swarms/agents/__init__.py
|
|
|
swarms/agents/__init__.py
|
|
|
8474 swarms/agents/auto_generate_swarm_config.py
|
|
|
swarms/agents/auto_generate_swarm_config.py
|
|
|
10408 swarms/agents/openai_assistant.py
|
|
|
swarms/agents/openai_assistant.py
|
|
|
1563 swarms/agents/ape_agent.py
|
|
|
swarms/agents/ape_agent.py
|
|
|
9389 swarms/agents/create_agents_from_yaml.py
|
|
|
swarms/agents/create_agents_from_yaml.py
|
|
|
5169 swarms/agents/tool_agent.py
|
|
|
swarms/agents/tool_agent.py
|
|
|
1129 swarms/tools/func_to_str.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/func_to_str.py
|
|
|
7184 swarms/tools/prebuilt/code_interpreter.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/prebuilt/code_interpreter.py
|
|
|
167 swarms/tools/prebuilt/__init__.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/prebuilt/__init__.py
|
|
|
1461 swarms/tools/prebuilt/math_eval.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/prebuilt/math_eval.py
|
|
|
4297 swarms/tools/prebuilt/code_executor.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/prebuilt/code_executor.py
|
|
|
2304 swarms/tools/prebuilt/bing_api.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/prebuilt/bing_api.py
|
|
|
978 swarms/tools/openai_func_calling_schema_pydantic.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/openai_func_calling_schema_pydantic.py
|
|
|
8880 swarms/tools/func_calling_executor.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/func_calling_executor.py
|
|
|
1639 swarms/tools/__init__.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/__init__.py
|
|
|
15776 swarms/tools/base_tool.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/base_tool.py
|
|
|
14504 swarms/tools/json_former.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/json_former.py
|
|
|
600 swarms/tools/cohere_func_call_schema.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/cohere_func_call_schema.py
|
|
|
4186 swarms/tools/tool_parse_exec.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/tool_parse_exec.py
|
|
|
15710 swarms/tools/py_func_to_openai_func_str.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/py_func_to_openai_func_str.py
|
|
|
3850 swarms/tools/pydantic_to_json.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/pydantic_to_json.py
|
|
|
773 swarms/tools/function_util.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/function_util.py
|
|
|
7992 swarms/tools/tool_registry.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/tool_registry.py
|
|
|
2816 swarms/tools/tool_utils.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/tool_utils.py
|
|
|
1316 swarms/tools/json_utils.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/json_utils.py
|
|
|
2965 swarms/tools/logits_processor.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/logits_processor.py
|
|
|
3542 swarms/tools/func_calling_utils.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/func_calling_utils.py
|
|
|
2578 swarms/tools/openai_tool_creator_decorator.py
|
|
|
swarms/tools/openai_tool_creator_decorator.py
|
|
|
10332 swarms/cli/main.py
|
|
|
swarms/cli/main.py
|
|
|
1128 swarms/cli/create_agent.py
|
|
|
swarms/cli/create_agent.py
|
|
|
6952 swarms/cli/onboarding_process.py
|
|
|
swarms/cli/onboarding_process.py
|
|
|
0 swarms/cli/__init__.py
|
|
|
swarms/cli/__init__.py
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To devise a strategy for breaking the knowledge graph into manageable window sizes based on the provided file data, we can follow a structured approach:
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 1. **Classification of Files**
|
|
|
Group files by their directories and functionalities. Here’s a categorized breakdown:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Structs**
|
|
|
- Core agent structures (e.g., `agent.py`, `base_structure.py`, etc.)
|
|
|
- Workflow management (e.g., `auto_swarm.py`, `multi_process_workflow.py`)
|
|
|
- **Telemetry**
|
|
|
- System information and logging (`bootup.py`, `user_utils.py`, etc.)
|
|
|
- **Schemas**
|
|
|
- Input and output schemas (`agent_input_schema.py`, `base_schemas.py`)
|
|
|
- **Prompts**
|
|
|
- Various prompt templates and agents (`ai_research_team.py`, `sales.py` etc.)
|
|
|
- **Agents**
|
|
|
- Agent creation and management logic (`openai_assistant.py`, `auto_generate_swarm_config.py`)
|
|
|
- **Tools**
|
|
|
- Utility functions and pre-built tools (`func_calling_executor.py`, `json_former.py`)
|
|
|
- **CLI**
|
|
|
- Command line interface files (`main.py`, `create_agent.py`)
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 2. **Calculating Byte Sizes**
|
|
|
From the provided data, calculate the cumulative sizes of files in each classified category if they are within the limit of the output token window size (around 16,384 bytes).
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 3. **Constructing Knowledge Partitions**
|
|
|
Create partitions ensuring that each partition stays within the token limit. Here are some example partitions:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Partition 1: Core Structures (Total Size ~43,000 bytes)**
|
|
|
- `agent.py` (93,913)
|
|
|
- `base_structure.py` (15,901)
|
|
|
- `auto_swarm.py` (8,215)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Partition 2: Workflow Management (Total Size ~52,000 bytes)**
|
|
|
- `multi_process_workflow.py` (7,973)
|
|
|
- `concurrent_workflow.py` (22,308)
|
|
|
- `swarming_architectures.py` (13,382)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Partition 3: Prompts (Total Size ~49,000 bytes)**
|
|
|
- `ai_research_team.py` (5,233)
|
|
|
- `sales.py` (5,126)
|
|
|
- `python.py` (13,215)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Partition 4: Telemetry (Total Size ~17,000 bytes)**
|
|
|
- `bootup.py` (1,854)
|
|
|
- `user_utils.py` (1,879)
|
|
|
- `capture_sys_data.py` (3,325)
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Partition 5: Agents (Total Size ~60,000 bytes)**
|
|
|
- `openai_assistant.py` (10,408)
|
|
|
- `create_agents_from_yaml.py` (9,389)
|
|
|
- Other utility agents...
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 4. **Visual Representation**
|
|
|
Use PlantUML to visualize the knowledge graph with each partition. Here’s a simplified representation to get started:
|
|
|
|
|
|
```plantuml
|
|
|
@startuml
|
|
|
package "Knowledge Graph" {
|
|
|
package "Core Structures" {
|
|
|
[Agent] --> [Base Structure]
|
|
|
[Agent] --> [Auto Swarm]
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
package "Workflow Management" {
|
|
|
[Multi-Process Workflow] --> [Concurrent Workflow]
|
|
|
[Swarming Architectures] --> [Auto Swarm]
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
package "Prompts" {
|
|
|
[AI Research Team] --> [Sales]
|
|
|
[Python] --> [Agent Prompts]
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
package "Telemetry" {
|
|
|
[Bootup] --> [User Utils]
|
|
|
[Capture Sys Data] --> [Sys Info]
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
package "Agents" {
|
|
|
[OpenAI Assistant] --> [Agent Creator]
|
|
|
[Agent Config] --> [Agent Loader]
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
package "Tools" {
|
|
|
[Function Executor] --> [JSON Former]
|
|
|
[Tool Registry] --> [Tool Parser]
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
@enduml
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 5. **Handling Output Size Constraints**
|
|
|
For any partition exceeding token limits, consider:
|
|
|
- **Further subdivision** into smaller units.
|
|
|
- **Prioritizing critical files** for knowledge transfer based on usage frequency or dependency.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 6. **Implementation**
|
|
|
Adapt and iterate through the classification and partitioning process to accommodate any additional files or changes in structure, ensuring optimal usability of your knowledge graph.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here is a simplified PlantUML diagram representing the code structure you provided. It categorizes files into their respective folders based on the given paths.
|
|
|
|
|
|
```plantuml
|
|
|
consider each of these packages, tag them and consider what we would expect of them
|
|
|
@startuml
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
package "swarms" {
|
|
|
package "structs" {
|
|
|
[agent.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[agent_registry.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[agent_router.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[agent_memory_manager.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[auto_swarm.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[base_structure.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[groupchat.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[stopping_conditions.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[spreadsheets_swarm.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[pulsar_swarm.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[hiearchical_swarm.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[rearrange.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[output_types.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[round_robin.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[company.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[mixture_of_agents.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[multi_process_workflow.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[concurrent_workflow.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[swarming_architectures.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[agents_available.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[safe_loading.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[base_workflow.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[swarm_load_balancer.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[queue_swarm.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[conversation.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[swarm_builder.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[utils.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[groupchat_new.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[swarm_router.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[graph_swarm.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[sequential_workflow.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[task.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[concat.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[swarm_matcher.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[multi_agent_collab.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[multi_agent_exec.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[graph_workflow.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[base_swarm.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[swarm_registry.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[swarm_arange.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[majority_voting.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[swarm_id_generator.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[tree_swarm.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[async_workflow.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To consider each of these packages, we can categorize them based on their functionality and expected outcomes within a swarming architecture. Here’s a brief overview of expected functionalities for some groups:
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Agent Management
|
|
|
- **agent.py**: Manages individual agent behaviors and properties.
|
|
|
- **agent_registry.py**: Tracks and manages the lifecycle of agents in the environment.
|
|
|
- **agent_memory_manager.py**: Handles memory allocation and data storage for agents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Workflow Coordination
|
|
|
- **base_workflow.py**: Defines the foundational structure for a swarm's workflow.
|
|
|
- **multi_process_workflow.py**: Manages workflows that involve multiple processes running concurrently.
|
|
|
- **async_workflow.py**: Implements asynchronous processing in workflows.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Communication and Collaboration
|
|
|
- **groupchat.py**: Facilitates communication between agents in a chat-like manner.
|
|
|
- **multi_agent_collab.py**: Coordinates collaboration activities between multiple agents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Task Management
|
|
|
- **task.py**: Represents a unit of work for the agents.
|
|
|
- **task_queue.py**: Manages task distribution among agents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Swarm Strategies
|
|
|
- **base_swarm.py**: Establishes the base structure and rules for swarm operations.
|
|
|
- **round_robin.py**: Implements a round-robin approach for task assignments.
|
|
|
- **majority_voting.py**: Facilitates decision-making through majority voting among agents.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Utilization and Tracking
|
|
|
- **utils.py**: Contains utility functions that aid in various operations across agents and workflows.
|
|
|
- **swarm_registry.py**: Keeps a registry of active swarms and their states.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Data Structure and Graphs
|
|
|
- **graph_swarm.py**: Implements swarming strategies based on graph structures.
|
|
|
- **tree_swarm.py**: Utilizes tree structures for organizing and guiding agent actions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each package should interact seamlessly, following the principles of swarming (e.g., decentralized control, self-organization) while fulfilling its expected role.
|
|
|
|
|
|
package "telemetry" {
|
|
|
[bootup.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[user_utils.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[sys_info.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[sentry_active.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[capture_sys_data.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[auto_upgrade_swarms.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
package "schemas" {
|
|
|
[agent_input_schema.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[agent_step_schemas.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[base_schemas.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
package "utils" {
|
|
|
[add_docs_to_agents.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[lazy_loader.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[data_to_text.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[litellm_wrapper.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[agent_ops_check.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[loguru_logger.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[update_agent_system_prompts.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[try_except_wrapper.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[swarm_reliability_checks.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[async_file_creation.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[pandas_utils.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
package "artifacts" {
|
|
|
[main_artifact.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
package "prompts" {
|
|
|
[ai_research_team.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[react.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[sales.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
package "agents" {
|
|
|
[openai_assistant.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[auto_generate_swarm_config.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
package "tools" {
|
|
|
[base_tool.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[tool_registry.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[func_calling_executor.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
package "cli" {
|
|
|
[main.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
[create_agent.py] <<file>>
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here’s a concise tagging and expectations summary for each package in the code structure:
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 1. Swarms
|
|
|
- **Tag:** Core Functionality
|
|
|
- **Expectations:** Implements swarming algorithms, agent management, workflows, and communication protocols.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 2. Telemetry
|
|
|
- **Tag:** Monitoring & Logging
|
|
|
- **Expectations:** Tracks system data, manages boot-up processes, and captures system metrics for performance analysis.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 3. Schemas
|
|
|
- **Tag:** Data Structures
|
|
|
- **Expectations:** Defines input/output schemas for agents and ensures data validation and integrity during processing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 4. Utils
|
|
|
- **Tag:** Utility Functions
|
|
|
- **Expectations:** Provides helper functions for logging, data conversion, error handling, and asynchronous file operations.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 5. Artifacts
|
|
|
- **Tag:** Data Storage
|
|
|
- **Expectations:** Manages persistent data artifacts or models generated by the system, facilitating retrieval and usage.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 6. Prompts
|
|
|
- **Tag:** Interaction Templates
|
|
|
- **Expectations:** Contains predefined interaction prompts for different contexts or agents, aiding in task-specific communication.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 7. Agents
|
|
|
- **Tag:** AI Agents
|
|
|
- **Expectations:** Implements specific agent functionalities, including interaction with external APIs like OpenAI.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 8. Tools
|
|
|
- **Tag:** Functional Extensions
|
|
|
- **Expectations:** Provides tools for executing functions, managing tool resources, and enhancing agent capabilities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 9. CLI
|
|
|
- **Tag:** Command Line Interface
|
|
|
- **Expectations:** Responsible for user interaction via command line, including agent creation and overall system management.}
|
|
|
|
|
|
@enduml
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
This representation captures the hierarchical structure of the code with the respective files in packages (folders). Each file is tagged as a `<<file>>` for clarity. You can visualize it using a PlantUML renderer. Adjust and add additional files or packages as necessary to fit your requirements!
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Given the files and their sizes, we can devise a strategy to group them into context windows of 16,384 output tokens. Here's a concise plan:
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. **Calculate Total File Sizes**: First, sum the sizes of all the files to determine how many chunks will be needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. **File Size Distribution**: Sort the files by size in descending order. This will help prioritize larger files, ensuring we utilize the token limit effectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. **Chunking Strategy**:
|
|
|
- Start from the largest file and keep adding files to the current chunk until the total size reaches or slightly exceeds the 16,384 token limit.
|
|
|
- If adding a file exceeds the limit, finalize the current chunk and start a new chunk with the current file.
|
|
|
- Repeat until all files are organized into chunks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. **Adjustments for Small Files**: If you encounter many small files, consider batching them together in a single chunk if they collectively do not exceed the token limit. This avoids many small chunks.
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. **Consider Dependencies**: If certain files depend on others (e.g., modules), try to keep those files within the same chunk to avoid issues when reading the code.
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. **Testing**: Run a test with a few chunks to ensure that they load correctly within the context window size.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here's a pseudocode implementation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
|
file_sizes = [
|
|
|
("swarms/structs/agent_registry.py", 10599),
|
|
|
("swarms/structs/omni_agent_types.py", 369),
|
|
|
# Add all other files with their sizes
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
max_size = 16384
|
|
|
current_chunk = []
|
|
|
current_size = 0
|
|
|
|
|
|
for file, size in sorted(file_sizes, key=lambda x: x[1], reverse=True):
|
|
|
if current_size + size <= max_size:
|
|
|
current_chunk.append(file)
|
|
|
current_size += size
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
# Save current_chunk to a list of chunks
|
|
|
save_chunk(current_chunk)
|
|
|
current_chunk = [file]
|
|
|
current_size = size
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Don't forget to save the last chunk
|
|
|
if current_chunk:
|
|
|
save_chunk(current_chunk)
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
By following this strategy, you can ensure that your code is managed within the constraints of your output token limit effectively.
|
|
|
To effectively manage the source code within the context window sizes of the GPT-4o model, you can implement a strategy to break down your Python files into chunks that fit within the token limits. Here's a straightforward approach:
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 2. Group Files by Size
|
|
|
Analyze the output to determine how to combine smaller files. Keep files that are individually below the model's limits together while ensuring combined sizes do not exceed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Input Context: 128,000 tokens
|
|
|
- Output Context: 16,384 tokens
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To manage your source code within the context window sizes of the GPT-4o model, follow this strategy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 1. Calculate Token Size
|
|
|
Estimate the token size for each file. Typically, 1 token is approximately 4 characters of code plus a newline. For simplicity, assume that 1,000 characters correspond to about 750 tokens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 2. Gather File Size Information
|
|
|
From your `wc -c` output, note the byte sizes of each file:
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Filename | Size (Bytes) | Approx Tokens |
|
|
|
|-----------------------------------------------|--------------|---------------|
|
|
|
| **Total** | **508,058** | **~381,044** |
|
|
|
| ... | ... | ... |
|
|
|
| (List all files as before) | | |
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 3. Group Smaller Files
|
|
|
You can group files to ensure the combined size remains well below limits:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Single Files**: For files under approximately 12,000 bytes (9000 tokens approx), they’re safe to process individually.
|
|
|
- **Batching**: For larger files, consider batching to stay within a buffer of 128,000 input tokens and 16,384 output tokens.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 4. List Groupings
|
|
|
Group files maintaining the total size for each group within limits. Example grouping could look like this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- **Group 1**:
|
|
|
- `swarms/structs/agent_registry.py` (~10,599 bytes)
|
|
|
- `swarms/structs/omni_agent_types.py` (~369 bytes)
|
|
|
- (Continue grouping similar-sized files while keeping the total < 128,000 bytes)
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 5. Example Grouping
|
|
|
A practical example could be:
|
|
|
- **Group 1**: `agent_registry.py`, `omni_agent_types.py`, `auto_swarm.py`, (`~20,000 bytes`)
|
|
|
- **Group 2**: `base_structure.py`, `agent_router.py` (`~30,000 bytes`)
|
|
|
- **Group 3**: `pulsar_swarm.py`, `workspace_manager.py` (`~18,000 bytes`)
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 6. Implementation
|
|
|
- Use a script to automate grouping. Loop through the files, calculate running total sizes while grouping files into lists that meet the criteria.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 7. Processing
|
|
|
Once grouped, you can feed each list of files into the GPT-4o model one at a time until all groups have been processed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Conclusion
|
|
|
This general structure should help you split the source code effectively, allowing you to work within the limits of the GPT-4o model while maintaining logical file groupings.
|
|
|
### 3. Chunking Strategy
|
|
|
Given that:
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Individual larger files ( `swarms/structs/agent.py`) should remain uncombined.
|
|
|
- Smaller files can be combined as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Example Grouping:
|
|
|
- Group files that total under 16,384, for example, from each subdirectory. Group smaller files together, ensuring they remain under the threshold.
|
|
|
|
|
|
```plaintext
|
|
|
- Group 1: (combine smaller files)
|
|
|
- swarms/telemetry/*.py
|
|
|
- swarms/utils/*.py
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Group 2: (larger files)
|
|
|
- swarms/artifacts/*.py
|
|
|
- swarms/prompts/*.py
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 4. Implementation
|
|
|
Create a script that iterates through the directories, groups files until the predefined token limits are reached, and saves each group in a way that retains the original directory structure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 5. Testing and Validation
|
|
|
After chunking, run a test to ensure that:
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Each chunk remains within token limits.
|
|
|
2. No critical functionality is lost when files are combined or separated.
|
|
|
3. The script handles edge cases (e.g., very small files or files with comments).
|
|
|
|
|
|
This strategy maintains modularity while improving processing efficiency within the given constraints of the model.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It appears your message was blank. If you have any further questions or need additional assistance, please let me know!
|
|
|
Now consider recombination patterns to recombine the results in a quasi-meta-merge sort.
|
|
|
we can see our work as a knuthean searching and sorting algorithm using the llm as our processor for partial ordering.
|
|
|
|
|
|
To implement a quasi-meta-merge sort using a language model (LLM) for recombination patterns, you can follow these algorithmic steps:
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 1. **Chunk Generation**
|
|
|
After chunking the Python files as described previously, treat each chunk as an item for processing. Each chunk will serve as an input for the LLM.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 2. **Define Quasi-Merge Criteria**
|
|
|
Establish criteria for how chunks will be combined and ordered:
|
|
|
- **Semantic Cohesion**: Chunks that deal with similar functionalities or modules (e.g., all agent-related chunks).
|
|
|
- **File Size**: Combine smaller chunks first before larger ones for efficient processing.
|
|
|
- **Dependency Order**: Ensure that files relying on others are processed in the correct order, using Dagger-like dependency management.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 3. **Processing with LLM**
|
|
|
Use the LLM to analyze chunks and suggest combinations based on the defined merge criteria:
|
|
|
- **Input**: Provide the LLM with pairs of chunks.
|
|
|
- **Output**: Ask it to rate or assess the coherence and compatibility of merging these chunks based on their content.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 4. **Recombination Patterns**
|
|
|
Implement a quasi-meta-merge pattern as follows:
|
|
|
1. **Pairing**: Start by pairing chunks for evaluation. Use a method like binary tree pairing or bucket sorting based on size or functionality.
|
|
|
2. **Evaluation**: For each pair, use the LLM to produce a compatibility score or a combined summary.
|
|
|
3. **Sorting**: Sort the results based on the LLM's feedback and scores, leading to a preliminary ordered list of chunks.
|
|
|
4. **Merge Process**: Recombine the pairs, generating merged outputs that represent cohesive functionalities.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 5. **Iterative Refinement**
|
|
|
After the initial combination:
|
|
|
- **Re-evaluate**: Feed merged outputs back into the LLM for assessment.
|
|
|
- **Adjust Pairings**: Depending on the feedback, adjust combinations, possibly splitting or merging further based on newly identified relationships.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### 6. **Final Collection**
|
|
|
Once pairs have been assessed and recombined:
|
|
|
- Collect final outputs.
|
|
|
- Reorganize them based on the original directory structure.
|
|
|
- Conduct a final review or testing phase ensuring that combined outputs maintain expected functionality.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Example Pseudocode
|
|
|
Here’s a brief pseudo-implementation for reference:
|
|
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
|
def quasi_meta_merge_sort(chunks):
|
|
|
pairs = generate_pairs(chunks)
|
|
|
evaluated_pairs = [(chunk1, chunk2, llm.evaluate(chunk1, chunk2)) for chunk1, chunk2 in pairs]
|
|
|
|
|
|
sorted_pairs = sort_by_evaluation_score(evaluated_pairs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
merged_chunks = []
|
|
|
for chunk1, chunk2, score in sorted_pairs:
|
|
|
merged_chunk = llm.merge(chunk1, chunk2)
|
|
|
merged_chunks.append(merged_chunk)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Re-evaluate and adjust iteratively
|
|
|
while needs_refinement(merged_chunks):
|
|
|
merged_chunks = re_evaluate(merged_chunks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
return final_output(merged_chunks)
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Conclusion
|
|
|
This algorithm leverages the LLM's processing capabilities to facilitate an advanced sorting and merging strategy. The result is a more organized collection of source code chunks, preserving functionality while enhancing modularity and clarity. This approach aligns well with Knuth’s methodology, focusing on efficient sorting and processing through intelligent structuring.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Here's how you can implement a quasi-meta-merge sort using a language model (LLM) to facilitate a knuthian searching and sorting algorithm for recombining the Python file chunks based on their functionalities and dependencies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Steps for Implementation
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. **Chunk Generation**:
|
|
|
- Start with previously created chunks of Python files, considering their token size and relevance.
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. **Define Quasi-Merge Criteria**:
|
|
|
- **Semantic Cohesion**: Identify functionally similar chunks (e.g., all related to agents).
|
|
|
- **File Size**: Prefer smaller chunks for initial combinations.
|
|
|
- **Dependency Management**: Maintain execution order based on dependencies.
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. **Processing with the LLM**:
|
|
|
- Use the LLM to analyze the compatibility of merging chunks. The input can be pairs of chunks, and the output will provide a compatibility score or suggestions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. **Recombination Patterns**:
|
|
|
- **Pairing**: Form an initial set of pairs from the chunks using methods like binary pairing or random sampling.
|
|
|
- **Evaluation via LLM**: For each pair, check how well they can be merged based on content and functionality:
|
|
|
```python
|
|
|
def evaluate_pairs(pair_list):
|
|
|
results = []
|
|
|
for chunk1, chunk2 in pair_list:
|
|
|
score, reasons = llm.evaluate_merge(chunk1, chunk2)
|
|
|
results.append((chunk1, chunk2, score, reasons))
|
|
|
return sorted(results, key=lambda x: x[2], reverse=True) # Sort by score
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. **Sort and Merge**:
|
|
|
- Use the evaluation results to sort and merge chunks, prioritizing those with higher compatibility scores first.
|
|
|
- Merge chunks based on evaluation.
|
|
|
```python
|
|
|
def merge_chunks(sorted_pairs):
|
|
|
merged_results = []
|
|
|
for chunk1, chunk2, score, reasons in sorted_pairs:
|
|
|
merged_chunk = llm.merge(chunk1, chunk2)
|
|
|
merged_results.append(merged_chunk)
|
|
|
return merged_results
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. **Iterative Refinement**:
|
|
|
- After the initial combination, submit the merged output to the LLM for further assessment. If required, adjust pairings based on new insights:
|
|
|
```python
|
|
|
def refine_merges(merged_chunks):
|
|
|
while requires_refinement(merged_chunks):
|
|
|
updated_chunks = []
|
|
|
for chunk in merged_chunks:
|
|
|
feedback = llm.refine(chunk)
|
|
|
updated_chunks.append(feedback)
|
|
|
merged_chunks = updated_chunks
|
|
|
return merged_chunks
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. **Final Collection**:
|
|
|
- Organize the final output, maintaining directory structure and ensuring functionality:
|
|
|
```python
|
|
|
def collect_final_output(merged_chunks):
|
|
|
output_path = organize_by_structure(merged_chunks)
|
|
|
save_to_directory(output_path)
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Pseudocode Example
|
|
|
Here’s a brief pseudocode putting it all together:
|
|
|
|
|
|
```python
|
|
|
def quasi_meta_merge_sort(chunks):
|
|
|
pairs = generate_pairs(chunks)
|
|
|
evaluated_pairs = evaluate_pairs(pairs)
|
|
|
sorted_pairs = sort_by_evaluation_score(evaluated_pairs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
merged_chunks = merge_chunks(sorted_pairs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
# Iteratively refine until no further improvements can be made
|
|
|
merged_chunks = refine_merges(merged_chunks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
return collect_final_output(merged_chunks)
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Considerations
|
|
|
- **Performance**: Monitor the efficiency, especially if the number of chunks is large.
|
|
|
- **LLM Costs**: Be mindful of usage costs or performance issues while querying the LLM.
|
|
|
- **Testing**: Ensure that the recombined code retains functionality; consider including unit tests for major components.
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Conclusion
|
|
|
The outlined approach leverages an intelligent merging algorithm supported by semantic analysis from an LLM, creating an organized, high-quality set of Python files. By implementing these patterns, you can achieve a robust, modular codebase that aligns with the principles of efficient searching and sorting, similar to Knuth's methodologies.
|