clean up

Former-commit-id: 02abbb0ad3fd7c41836ab9a7098ad93ff31747b8

DOCS/DEVELOPER_PLAN.md

@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@ Such a model not only aligns with our values of openness, collaboration, and sha
 
 The open source engineering freelancer model brings with it its own set of potential risks and challenges. Here's an exploration of some of these, along with strategies for mitigation:
 
-**1. Quality Control:** When dealing with a wide network of freelance contributors, ensuring a consistent standard of quality across all contributions can be challenging. This can be mitigated by implementing rigorous review processes and standards, establishing an automated testing infrastructure, and fostering a culture of quality among contributors. Providing clear contribution guidelines, code style guides, and other resources can help freelancers understand what's expected of them.
+**1. Quality Control:** When dealing with a wide network of freelance contributors, ensuring a consistent standard of quality across all contributions can be challenging. This can be mitigated by implementing rigorous review processes and standards, establishing an automated testing infrastructure, and fostering a culture of quality among contributors. Providing clear contribution guidelines, code style guides, and other resources can help freelancers understand what's expected of them. Providing Educational resources such as sponsoring creators like Yannic, and even making our own courses and then building techno-monasteries where young people can come in and research for free. 
 
 **2. Security Risks:** Open-source projects can be susceptible to malicious contributors, who might introduce vulnerabilities into the codebase. To mitigate this, rigorous code review processes should be in place. Additionally, adopting a "trust but verify" approach, leveraging automated security scanning tools, and conducting periodic security audits can be beneficial.